|MASUHARA Naoki||Senior Researcher|
|YAMAMOTO Aya||Research Associate|
|IWASAKI Yumiko||Research Associate|
This program aims at providing realistic perspectives and options to facilitate the transformation towards a society that can flexibly respond to environmental changes caused by human activities such as global warming and air pollution, as well as to natural disasters.
To demonstrate the fundamental significance of global environmental sustainability for human society, we need to make intellectually explicit the links between environmental change and natural disasters on the one hand, and social issues such as livelihood, inequality, social security and conflict on the other, and reinforce understanding of these links in the real world. RIHN’s Societal Transformation under Environmental Change research program contributes to this task.
The Program follows two lines of inquiry. The first conducts research on Asia’s long-term paths of social and economic development in relation to climate change and environmental history. Such studies offer historical understandings of the human-nature interface. For example, postwar development of the industrial complex along Asia’s Pacific coast was made possible by the combination of imported fossil fuels and utilization of rich local resources of land, water and biomass. Urban and industrial development in the region produced both rapid economic growth and at times severe environmental pollution and degradation. It is important to recognize the causes and consequences of these historical processes in their own light, as well as for their significance to future societal change and policy deliberations.
The Program’s second line of inquiry examines the kinds of motivations that affect peoples’ livelihoods and seeks social transformation of norms and institutions by working closely with various stakeholders in local society. The project on Sumatra’s tropical peatlands identified four principal kinds of motivations—local livelihood, profit of local farmers and agricultural and industrial enterprises, local and centrally-based governance, and conservation measures implemented by governments, NGOs and international institutions—and examines how they can be best coordinated to promote sustainability at the village level. Another project on Punjab, India, studies how to prevent stubble burning accompanying the introduction of a compressed double cropping calendar after the Green Revolution, causing pressure on water and land, as well as air pollution and health hazards. Meanwhile, the ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction project investigates the potential of various ecosystem services to address natural disaster risks in Japan, where population decline creates additional dimensions to this issue, which is or could become relevant in many other Asian countries.▲PAGE TOP
|KARATSU Fukiko||Research Associate|
Global environmental problems are inter-related. Studies concentrating on single issues are therefore often not effective and consideration of the links between multiple resources involving stakeholders is essential. Recently, the nexus structure linking energy, water and food production has become a prominent area of study, but truly sustainable societies require more comprehensive understandings of the ecological resources that provide ecosystem services and cultural resources. The production, circulation and consumption of resources should be discussed in relation to a range of spatial scales, and stakeholders should be involved in these discussions. Sustainable use of resources requires fair and wise management systems as well as indices capable of managing these processes.
Many existing socio-economic or human behavioral systems must be converted or transformed into new systems capable of addressing the special qualities of renewable natural resources, as these qualities have sometimes been externalized from conventional economics. Asia is experiencing rapid change in economy, urbanization and population, though traditional techniques for sustainable resource management, associated with the relatively rich human sphere and cultural background in this region also survive. Study of this long-standing Asian experience of resource use may offer important observations about sustainability in general.
RIHN research projects have accumulated information and suggestions necessary to this transformation in resource management, though gaps remain. Program Two therefore explores wise and fair management systems capable of addressing multiple resource-uses by multiple stakeholders, in multi-spatial scales. We encourage new project proposals including those by innovative young scientists addressing such novel and under-examined subjects. Program research should also address the social conditions that support transformation of values and human behavior, as they should also inform new indices and institutions for fair resource management.
In 2019, we enlarged our database of resource supply and demand in Japan to the municipality level, with particular emphasis on ecosystem services. The database could be utilized to assist comparative and integrative analyses of research sites. One initial analysis of this database indicated that prefectural sustainability is related to population density. It is also useful to consider the inter linkages among the resource use sustainability, which could be developed to address SDG targets.▲PAGE TOP
More than 60% of the world’s population resides in Asia and over a third of global economic activity occurs there. Asia is comprised of an incredible diversity of cultures, histories, societies, economies, livelihoods, and ecologies. Asia is also affected by myriad global and local environmental issues, such as population increase, air, water, soil, and coastal pollution, increasing greenhouse gas emissions, and biodiversity loss. The region is also affected by growing wealth disparity, social isolation, rising levels of poverty, and the disappearance of traditional cultures and knowledge. The combination of migration between the countryside and cities, rural depopulation, and urban concentration is accompanied by rapid socio-cultural change, over-exploitation of resources, and deterioration of natural environments. Both urban and rural lifeworlds are disintegrating rapidly.
As a consequence, in reconstructing the lifeworld concept and highlighting the reciprocal linkages between rural and urban spaces, Program 3 designs lifeworlds of sustainability and wellbeing and co-creates concrete pathways for their realization. Program research is based on the diverse world-views and accumulation of experience of human-nature co-existence. These latent socio-cultural elements, such as livelihood styles, lay knowledge, conflict resolution strategies, and the vitality of the people themselves, can be called upon to address contemporary problems and to help chart a course toward possible future societies. Program 3 builds upon these experiences and knowledges of human-nature interaction to propose concrete changes needed to achieve a sustainable society.
The transformations and frameworks leading to sustainable urban and rural lifeworld design will also entail fundamental shifts in existing economic systems, markets, and political decision-making systems. Rather than investigating top-down approaches to system change, Program 3 will work with local residents, government officials, companies, citizen groups and other stakeholders to propose sustainable alternatives and gauge their feasibility. In order to avoid the risk of developing proposals that are only applicable to specific regions or sites, Program 3 will aim for research results that are generalizable while also retain the diversity at the heart of local lifeworlds and wellbeing.
How we engage with our stakeholders is very important in promoting transdisciplinary research. It seems that there are many abstract principles, but when applying them to the field, it is difficult to connect them to a concrete way of doing things. For this reason, we have started the "How to Engage Citizens in Practice Discussion” Meeting with people who have relations with stakeholders. This discussion has allowed us to slowly see the "rules" of concrete practices. One of the goals of our practice is to shift the way citizens think about and live towards sustainability, and we are slowly learning how to design such systems. At the same time, we are conducting an ecological footprint project to measure energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in our research buildings and travel.▲PAGE TOP